Quantcast
Channel: BAM blog
Viewing all 1023 articles
Browse latest View live

Michael Mann: To the Limit

$
0
0
James Caan in Thief. Photo courtesy MGM/Photofest
By Nick Pinkerton

BAMcinématek presents Heat & Vice: The Films of Michael Mann, Feb 5—16. Michael Mann’s films combine a verbal taciturnity with a baroque visual style. They aren’t much for talking, but they’re something to see. His protagonists, the loquacious title character of Ali (2001) being an outlier, don’t have time to dilly-dally or mince words. Instead they fall back on a few tried-and-true pragmatic personal codes that Mann’s aficionados can recite, mantra-like: “Life is short. Time is luck,” or, “There hasn’t been a hard time invented that we can’t handle.”

Frank (James Caan), the safecracker protagonist of Mann’s revolutionary theatrical feature debut, Thief (1981), says what he means once, clearly, and with the intention of being understood. Largely shot on the streets, alleys, and industrial fringes of Mann’s hometown, Chicago, Thief is grounded in authenticity and firsthand knowhow—a solid relationship to the physical facts of the world—that marked '70s American action films. The dialogue is criminal argot and shop talk; the characters are drawn from local lore, police blotters, and direct experience. Cops and crooks are played by actual cops and crooks (Dennis Farina and John Santucci); the film uses working tools rather than props, from handguns to heat lances.

Running alongside Mann’s documentary impulse, however, is his presentational conception of the cinematic world, a perspective tending toward the theatrical and artificial more traditionally associated with, say, Japanese cinema. Embellishing the film with rain, neon, a Tangerine Dream soundtrack, and a few expressive camera gestures, Mann creates a half-mythological Chicagoland. In the blue-collar actioner, overt stylization was held as something suspect and sissified, ostracized to the musical comedy. Along with Japanophile Paul Schrader’s American Gigolo, released the previous year—and the launch of MTV, with which Thief’s appearance was almost exactly contemporary—Mann’s film was one exemplar of a sea change in the integration of overt stylization into new sectors of American popular culture, with Miami Vice, the television show that he produced for five seasons beginning in 1984 leading the way.

Jamie Foxx and Colin Farrell in Miami Vice. Photo courtesy Universal Pictures/Photofest.
More than a mere follower of fashion, Mann understands how changing technology shapes the look of the world—he’s a gearhead with a passion for deep-dive research, which puts him in good stead with his reported forthcoming Enzo Ferrari biopic. He never neglects to show the fiber-optic strings that make the modern world work, either through the manufacture of mass media in Ali and The Insider (1999), or in its role in conducting three generations of state-of-the-art nationwide investigations in Manhunter (1986), Heat (1995), and Miami Vice (2006). (Or a J. Edgar Hoover-retro version of the same in 2009’s Public Enemies.)

Because tech is used in a practical, matter-of-fact way in Mann’s films, they don’t date like showroom productions that proudly roll out the latest model. Blackhat (2015) is perhaps unique in redeeming that often loathed subgenre, the cyber-thriller—a movie that actually gets the feel of living in the digital drift. Among major studio directors, Mann was an early adopter of digital photography, converting completely with Collateral (2004), never trying to replicate film but rather exploring the new potentialities of the digital image in both texture and the capacity to shoot action. The result—a frantic and percussive new kind of duck-and-cover screen firefight.

Far from fitting the stereotype of the cold-blooded technician, Mann makes films which fairly throb with emotion. From the lay-it-on-the-line diner scene between Caan and Tuesday Weld in Thief to its reincarnation with Chris Hemsworth and Tang Wei in a Koreatown restaurant in Blackhat, Mann has always been fascinated by the unseen, ineffable connections which draw people together from across great divides—and physical passion and emotional harmony are of central importance within his action stories. The Last of the Mohicans (1992) contains the most obvious manifestation of Mann’s Romanticism, as well as his most cogent and classical set pieces. In his late period, Mann has taken to working in impressionistically smeared camerawork, up-the-nose angles, handheld tumult—the cinematic equivalent of “loose brushwork.”

Mann’s cinema today is a liminal, margin-walking art—whether pushing a narrative as far as possible into the realm of abstraction while attempting to keep it working as a satisfying genre piece, or shooting in extreme low light-conditions as to produce a “noisy” image, pushed until it starts to break into its constituent parts. A line from Miami Vice—typically overblown, cocksure, and quite cool—encapsulates his all-in approach to each new project: “Let’s take it to the limit one more time.”

Heat & Vice: The Films of Michael Mann comes to BAMcinématek February 5—16, with an in-person appearance by Mann on Thursday, February 11.

Nick Pinkerton is a New York-based writer. His work appears regularly in Film Comment, Artforum, Sight & Sound, Frieze, Reverse Shot, and Little White Lies. There hasn’t been a hard time invented that he can’t handle.

Reprinted from January 2016 BAMbill.

BAM Illustrated: Thomas Merton

In Context: The Glory of the World

$
0
0


Charles Mee's The Glory of the World, directed by Les Waters, comes to BAM January 16—February 6. Context is everything, so get even closer to the production with this curated selection of articles and videos related to the show. After you've attended the show, let us know what you thought below and by posting on social media using #GloryoftheWorld.

Program Notes

The Glory of the World (PDF)

Read

BAM Illustrated
10 Things You Should Know About Thomas Merton (BAM Blog)
Pope Francis loves him. Louisville almost named a bridge after him. And Joni Mitchell was a fan.

Article
“The Mystic, the Monk and the Play Brought to You by Powerball” (The New York Times)
The Glory of the World is deferential. But “people who want Merton to be like a box full of kittens may not find this to their liking,” says Waters.

Article
“Glory Be” (BAM Blog)
“It’s through form—and acts of withholding— that the play invites audiences to enter imaginatively into Merton’s meditative process,” says Marty Rosen.

Essay
“A Love Letter to BAM” (BAM Blog)
For Charles Mee, BAM went from being a “neglected pile of stones” off Flatbush Avenue to nothing short of “home.”

Interview
"Humana 2015: Charles Mee Toasts the Many Sides of Thomas Merton" (American Theater)
“The playwrights who get the best productions are the dead playwrights,” says Mee. Why? “Because they don’t go to rehearsal.”

Article
“Thomas Merton and Louisville's Search for a Hometown Hero” (The New Republic) 
Louisville needs a name for a new bridge. Who better than one of Pope Francis’s “four representatives of the American people”?

Watch & Listen

Video
Les Waters on The Glory of the World (YouTube) 
“We were interested in who this person [was] and what everybody claims him to be,” says the director.

Worthwhile Words

I’m a big believer that theatre shouldn’t oversimplify things and make stuff easy: A causes B causes C causes D. I really think the way the world really is is: A causes B causes C, plus 237, causes purple causes volcanic eruption causes a song and dance. That just seems like real life to me. We human characters are much more complex than the plotline of A causes B causes C.
–Charles Mee

Now your turn...

What did you think? Impressed by the oblique way Mee and Waters captured their subject? Inclined to rush off and read Merton’s The Seven Storey Mountain? Tell us what's on your mind in the comments below and on social media using #GloryOfTheWorld.

Dance, Valiant & Molecular

$
0
0
Newark (Niweweorce). Photo: Stephanie Berger


By Susan Yung

On the surface, Trisha Brown’s proscenium dances are kinetically intriguing and relatable, formed of waves of roiling, fluid phrases. But dig down, and the intellectual rigor and self-imposed rules factoring into their creation reveal Brown’s fascinating thought processes, and connect them to her early task-based or site-specific works such as Walking on the Wall or Roof Piece. Three major proscenium works will be performed by the Trisha Brown Dance Company at the BAM Howard Gilman Opera House from January 28—30, celebrating a relationship that dates from 1976.

As organic as her movement appears, Brown laid down fairly specific action guidelines. In her essay “How to Make Modern Dance When the Sky’s the Limit” (in Trisha Brown: Dance and Art in Dialogue, 1961—2001), she described the dance’s essential structure. “For Set and Reset, I made a very long phrase that circumvented the outside edge of the stage, serving as a conveyor belt to deliver duets, trios, and solos into the center of the stage. All of the dancers were taught the phrase and given the following set of five instructions: 1. Keep it simple. (The clarity issue.) 2. Play with visibility and invisibility. (The privacy issue.) 3. If you don’t know what to do, get in line. (Helping out with downtime.) 4. Stay on the outside edge of the stage (The spatial issue.) 5. Act on instinct. (The wild card.)”

Set and Reset. Photo: Stephanie Berger
Brown collaborated on six dances with Robert Rauschenberg, including Set and Reset (which premiered in 1983 as part of the first Next Wave Festival); Laurie Anderson provided the hypnotic score, with its robotic refrain of “long time no see.” Brown wrote, “The proscenium stage is something like a wasteland when you approach it without light, costumes, and set. I turned to Robert Rauschenberg, a painter and sculptor with extensive experience in the theater, to supply the missing elements, to create the stage picture that the audience encounters when the curtain goes up.” After much dialogue, including midnight phone calls from Bob to Trisha, the work took shape, evolving into a repertory classic.

One of Brown’s operative tenets was visibility/ invisibility, and here the use of the stage’s legs—the vertical drapes hiding the offstage area—came into play. “The stage’s velour legs have been reconstituted as see-through black scrim edged with a vertical stripe of ice-white satin, which demarcates the difference between onstage behavior and off,” she wrote. “Our sanctuary is gone, invisibility dashed, downtime on display. To this situation Bob added gorgeous filmy white transparent costumes, silkscreened with pale-gray-to-black urban industrial images.” Set and Reset is from Brown’s “unstable molecular cycle,” one of several poetically named series comprising her oeuvre that hew to certain concepts or dogma.

Newark (Niweweorce) (1987) falls into the “valiant cycle,” characterized by athleticism and full-out physical experimentation; Donald Judd designed the set, and Peter Zummo wrote the score. Brown writes, “I began my search for vocabulary by pushing furniture around in the studio. This behavior translated into a resolve to push myself and my dancers into powerful movement and carefully designed bodygeometries, initially similar to furniture.” It is remarkable for its technical and physical difficulty and the spatial manipulation of the moving scenography. Brown noted, “Don’s stage design comprised five proscenium-size drops in the three primary colors plus brown and another shade of red. They split the stage into sections forming four corridors, which could alternately block and reveal the dance.”

By asking a visionary artist to collaborate, Brown had in turn become obligated to Judd’s scheme. “I had unwittingly allowed Judd to usurp the choreographer’s territory of time and space. He could cut off a dancer flung high in an arc, or confine us in a narrow strip on the downstage light line, five feet deep and 40 wide. My choreographic solution was to visually design the dance into the motional elements of the set, albeit adapting a few aspects to my favor. Why did I put up with it? Too late to change for one, but remember that abstract modern dance, unfettered by story and music, is, necessarily, in search of a logic or rationale to reduce the proliferation of options that hang around winking at us. The Newark set did impose tough dialogues and severe internal limitations, but it also delivered a spatial and temporal score that forced invention and issued one of the most striking pieces in our repertory.”

PRESENT TENSE (2003) rounds out the BAM program, with set design by Elizabeth Murray and a score by John Cage. This work falls into Brown’s “music cycle,” a bit ironic since Cage poked music’s rules. It features dancers lifting one another—soaring, suspended; weightless, then weighty. Murray was a longtime friend of Trisha Brown, who has produced a significant output as a visual artist. Her body of work germinated and flourished in 1970s New York, where boundaries between genres fell away and collaboration was not simply choice, but a way to live and create. These stately proscenium dances are the largest-scale works in a richly layered oeuvre.

Trisha Brown Dance Company comes to BAM January 28—30, and tickets are still available.

Susan Yung is Senior Editorial Manager at BAM.

Reprinted from December 2016 BAMbill.

BAM Blog Questionnaire: Will Oldham of The Glory of the World

$
0
0
Tonight, Will Oldham (better known by the stage name Bonnie 'Prince' Billy) takes over the role of "The Man" in Charles Mee's new play The Glory of the Worldplaying the BAM Harvey Theater through February 6. We spoke with Oldham about posture, persona, and the public domain in anticipation of his BAM debut.

Will Oldham (Bonnie 'Prince' Billy).

How did you connect with Les Waters (artistic director of Actors Theatre of Louisville)? Have you worked on any other projects together in your hometown of Louisville?

It’s been a couple of years. Around when Waters came to town, somebody or some force allowed us to get together, and we have met and spoken about this or that. I go to see the work he directs, which is stronger and more satisfying with each successive production.

For the first few performances, Les Waters will play The Man. Then you take over the role for the remainder of the run. Tell us more about the role of The Man in The Glory of the World.

It isn’t a role in the traditional theatrical sense. The person who represents The Man occupies a space Les was standing in, and soon I will be standing in for Les standing in. The Man is invisible, and the occupier of the role signals to the audience where The Man is likely to be, implying that the chaos around the role is directed around a bagful of ideas, which might in turn be called a Dispersal of Merton.

Your role requires no movement or speaking. What are you thinking about during your time on stage?

This is intriguing! The occupier of The Man’s role is allowed a fragment of contemplation. It’s pretty rare that one can be contemplative on stage in the middle of a production. Probably posture comes to mind, and there is some effort given to deflecting any projections of persona.

The Glory of the World in production. Photo: Joan Marcus

Did you know about Thomas Merton before your involvement with The Glory of the World? You both are men who inhabit many, sometimes conflicting, roles. Do you relate to the various ways people perceive his character and legacy?

My mother had a lot of Merton on her bookshelves. And in Louisville there is talk of Merton in this circle or that. It’s off-putting when a person who is meant to extol certain ideas is mentioned more often than the ideas s/he has explored. I was ecstatic after seeing the play because the name is obliterated over the course of the piece—the dead human is allowed to be a dead human and make way for the living.

What would be your ultimate birthday celebration?

The “Happy Birthday” song came to being in Louisville many years ago, and the copyright for the song has infamously been in private hands. I felt that this was a black mark on Louisville’s cultural legacy and so the year before last I wrote a new happy birthday song. I wanted it to be as simple and memorable as the classic jam, and I wanted to make sure that it remained in the public domain. Last year on my birthday, a friend in Turkey went around to various great Turkish musicians and filmed each artist singing this new birthday song. He then sent me all of the videos. It was one of the best birthday presents ever; I cried all day long. Now I’m told that the courts recently made “Happy Birthday” public domain, and so the place for my composition is compromised. All of that said, I’m into the idea of celebrating the conception day rather than the birth day. Really, we should just be celebrating each other most of the time.

What are you most looking forward to doing during your time in Brooklyn and at BAM?

I’m most looking forward to clocking into this play every day and riding the wild ride that this company has constructed.

The Glory of the World plays the BAM Harvey Theater through Saturday, February 6, and great seats are still available.

In Context: Trisha Brown Dance Company

$
0
0


The Trisha Brown Dance Company comes to BAM January 28—30 with Set and Reset, PRESENT TENSE and Newark (Niweweorce). Context is everything, so get even closer to the production with this curated selection of articles and videos related to the show. After you've attended the show, let us know what you thought below and by posting on social media using #TrishaBrown.

Program Notes

Trisha Brown Dance Company (PDF)

Read

Article
Dance, Valiant & Molecular (BAM blog)
"On the surface, Trisha Brown’s proscenium dances are kinetically intriguing and relatable, formed of waves of roiling, fluid phrases. But dig down, and the intellectual rigor and self-imposed rules factoring into their creation reveal Brown’s fascinating thought processes..."

Article
“Step-By-Step Guide to Dance: Trisha Brown”(The Guardian)
Particle vs. wave dance. Addition and multiplication dance. Get to know the many sides of Trisha Brown.

Conversation
“Misha and Trisha, Talking Dance” (The New York Times)
Trisha Brown and Mikhail Baryshnikov trade stories about dance, photography, and golf.

Conversation
Trisha Brown and Yvonne Rainer (BOMB)
“I am well aware there is more to dance than elegant vocabulary,” says Brown. “It ain’t ‘boy meets girl to music’”

Watch & Listen



Video
Trisha Brown Informance (YouTube)
Brown discusses notions of invisibility and geometry in Set and Reset.

Video
Insight: On Trisha Brown’s Set and Reset (YouTube)
Brown’s work is based on five instructions: line up, play with visibility, travel the edge of the space, act on instinct, and keep it simple.

Video
Pioneers of the Downtown Scene: Laurie Anderson, Trisha Brown, and Gordon Matta-Clark (YouTube)
A portrait of innovation in 1970s New York.

Worthwhile Words

“I obscure, erase, ride over gestures […] I retain a modicum of privacy while on full view in performance by purposely complicating an uncanny moment, feeling certain the audience can’t see it all.”—Trisha Brown

Now your turn...

What did you think? What’s most iconic about the icon? Tell us what's on your mind in the comments below and on social media using #TrishaBrown.

Honoring Maya Plisetskaya

$
0
0
Maya Plisetskaya. Photo: ITAR-TASS Photo Agency
By Susan Yung

Dance may be the most viscerally affecting of art forms, but its evanescence is painfully apparent when considering the bygone stars of, for example, ballet—in this case, Russian prima ballerina assoluta Maya Plisetskaya (1925—2015), whose career reached its height mid-20th century. Most people, even ballet fans, have little first-hand knowledge of this famous dancer. And yet she has exerted a profound influence on the genre and its current standard-bearers, such as the Mariinsky Theatre’s Diana Vishneva and Uliana Lopatkina, who bring four Maya-inspired programs to BAM this month, with the Mariinsky’s magnificent orchestra led by Maestro Valery Gergiev, who was a friend of Plisetskaya’s. With the help of archival troves and the ubiquity of video, we can glean why she made such an impression on our era’s artists.

From the outset, there’s a divide—Plisetskaya was a Bolshoi ballerina, and we will be seeing Mariinsky stars paying her tribute. But there’s a deep-rooted connection: In 1943, for three months, Maya studied with Agrippina Vaganova, after whom the Mariinsky’s legendary Vaganova Ballet Academy is named (although she assumed leadership of it long after its founding). Of the teacher, in the 1976 book Portrait of Plisetskaya (Progress Publishers, Moscow), Maya said: “Her lessons provided a unique combination of academic grounding and at the same time full inner freedom and an awareness of one’s power over one’s own body.” Vaganova’s skill was so great, she adds, that “she could teach an elephant to dance.”

Uliana Lopatkina. Photo: Valentin Baranovsky
Her American debut was belated, relative to the trajectory of her career. The USSR was under Communist rule, and her political beliefs may have hindered her freedom to tour with the Bolshoi. (She even signed a petition against elevating the reputation of Stalin.) But when she finally appeared in New York, her performance matched advance buzz. New York Times’ critic John Martin gushed, “To see a body so responsive to the theatrical moods of the passing moment, so creatively energized, and so completely without technical problems is quite an experience. And when it belongs to so enchanting a personality, it becomes doubly so. No wonder audiences scream and yell with delight whenever she appears.” His gratitude extended to Krushchev: “Spasibo, Nikita Sergeyevitch!,” he ended the review.

With the Bolshoi, Plisetskaya performed for President Kennedy in his first outing after the Cuban Missile Crisis in November of 1962. The First Lady, Jacqueline Kennedy, and daughter Caroline had watched a company rehearsal that afternoon. Caroline was so taken that she asked to watch another rehearsal. It is during that tumultuous era of US-Soviet relations, when war seemed a hair-trigger away, and figures such as Rudolf Nureyev were defecting, that Plisetskaya’s popularity peaked.

New York Times critic Clive Barnes reviewed a 1963 London Bolshoi performance of Don Quixote, and wrote, “Miss Plisetskaya, practically snarling with happiness, swept through it exultantly and triumphantly. Her wild pantherine leaps and rapid turns were breathtaking; this was bravura dancing of simple greatness.”

While Plisetskaya performed outside of the USSR in classic Bolshoi ballets such as Giselle and Swan Lake, she was also featured in Soviet fare such as Spartacus, a vivid spectacle of flash and power. But she also guested with Maurice Béjart’s Ballet of the 20th Century, dancing in Boléro, which he created for her. As Barnes noted in The Times: “Béjart and Plisetskaya have something very much in common—they are rebels, populists and both have a mixture of intensity and sincerity that is all but unbearable, but comes across as true. They also both share a special view of the physicality, even the sensuality, of dance. … The collaboration between Béjart and Plisetskaya might at first sight seem odd. But when you look at it, it really isn’t. They are both classical ruffians, and they are both intensely concerned with immediate communication with audiences.”



At BAM, we will see the film of Plisetskaya dancing Boléro, accompanied by Gergiev leading the Mariinsky Orchestra. The New York Times’ James Oestreich covered it when it was performed at the 2015 Verbier Festival (Switzerland): “Ms. Plisetskaya’s dancing on the film is utterly captivating in its simplicity, and Mr. Gergiev managed the tricky task of wedding the musical performance to its every subtly shifting beat. The Russian composer Rodion Shchedrin, Ms. Plisetskaya’s widower and another Gergiev intimate, was in attendance.” She spent the latter part of her life living with Shchedrin in Munich, distanced from the Bolshoi.

BAM audiences will see Lopatkina perform The Dying Swan, a solo for which Plisetskaya was famous. In Portrait of Plisetskaya, she revealed insight on her interpretation. “In Dying Swan, for example, the arms are the swan itself, its fight against death. The arms are its swan song, its melody.” She added, “It’s important to dance the music, not to the music.”


Additional highlights will include other roles danced by Plisetskaya, such as excerpts from La Rose Malade, Carmen Suite, and Melody, choreographed by Plisetskaya’s uncle, Assaf Messerer, and numerous others. The Mariinsky Orchestra will also present a program of Prokofiev’s five piano concertos performed by five stellar pianists, conducted by Gergiev.

The Mariinsky's Tributes to Maya Plisetskaya come to BAM Feb 25—28, and great tickets are still available.

Susan Yung is Senior Editorial Manager at BAM.

Reprinted from January 2016 BAMbill.

The Maly's Cherry

$
0
0
Photo: Viktor Vasiliev


By Carol Rocamora
“My darling, how hard it was for me to write that play.”
So wrote an ailing 43-year-old playwright named Anton Chekhov, when he sent The Cherry Orchard (coming to the BAM Harvey Theater Feb 17—27) to his wife at the Moscow Art Theatre in October 1903. Whereas each of his previous plays had taken him only weeks to write, this one took him almost two years. It would be his last.

Chekhov’s first symptoms of consumption came in 1884, the year he graduated from medical school. He ignored the warnings. “It’s probably just a burst blood vessel,” he wrote dismissively, plunging into work. During the next year he would practice medicine, write 100 short stories, and experiment with vaudeville.

But the symptoms persisted, with hemorrhages in 1886, 1889, and 1897—when the official diagnosis came. His doctors banished him to Yalta, “my hot Siberia,” as he called it, far from Moscow and the Russian countryside that he loved. Even in decline, he managed to write three of his four masterworks: The Seagull (1896), Uncle Vanya (1897), and The Three Sisters (1901).

The idea for his last play came to him in late 1901, but he didn’t begin work on it till the summer of 1902. His wife Olga Knipper (the Art Theatre’s leading lady) was recovering from peritonitis after a traumatic miscarriage, and Stanislavsky offered the grieving couple his estate for the summer. Depressed, Olga begged Chekhov to write another play for the company. “I have the title—'The Cherry Orchard,'” he replied (recalling his beloved trees at Melikhovo, his abandoned dacha in the north). A motley assortment of guests and servants—including a strange governess, a clumsy footman, and a lively maid—were also summering there, and Chekhov, the great observer of human behavior, began assembling a cast of characters in his imagination.

Still, he procrastinated. Throughout the fall and winter, he distracted himself with a rewrite of On the Harmful Effects of Tobacco, his favorite monologue. Stanislavsky and Nemirovich-Danchenko (the Art Theatre’s co-founders) wrote letters entreating him to finish the play—but to no avail. In April 1903, he came to Moscow to be with Olga, offering the excuse that he was blocked. “Anyway, I can only manage six or seven lines a day,” he wrote, as his illness progressed.

Then finally in mid-September, back in Yalta, he sent the finished play to Moscow. The company read the script, and Stanislavsky telegrammed him, ecstatic: “The author is a genius… How we wept!”

Stanislav Nikolski and Polina Prikhodko. Photo: Viktor Vasiliev.
“Wept?” Chekhov replied, bewildered. “But The Cherry Orchard is a comedy!” He barraged the company with letters, giving detailed instructions on how to play each role. Alarmed by reports of Stanislavsky’s direction, Chekhov insisted on coming to Moscow to attend rehearsals, sick as he was. “He wants a train in Act II?! Frogs and corncrakes?! Stanislavsky must be stopped!” he wrote Olga, enraged at Stanislavsky’s habit of drowning his plays in irritating sound effects.

On opening night, January 17, 1904, they dragged him up on stage. He was so weak that he could hardly stand, and could not control his coughing. Deeply moved, the audience and the cast (including Olga as Ranevskaya and Stanislavsky as Gaev) applauded him. He died 5-½ months after the play opened. He was 44.

“Good bye old life, hello new life!” cries Anya in Act IV, as she exits into the unknown. The Cherry Orchard offers Chekhov’s farewell to the Russia he knew. The decline of the landed gentry, the emancipation of the serfs, the rise of industrialism, the emergence of the middle class, the ineffectiveness of the intelligentsia, the seeds of revolution—all the great changes he saw in his lifetime are incorporated in four defining acts, as his characters deal with the present and face a future Chekhov would never live to see.

Lev Dodin, inspired interpreter of Chekhov’s plays, has dazzled audiences with his productions at the Maly Theatre in St. Petersburg and around the world. His celebrated Platonov played at London’s Barbican Center (2007), while his passionate Uncle Vanya (2010) and haunting Three Sisters (2012) were performed to great acclaim at BAM, which welcomes the return of Maly Theatre from Feb 17—27.

Carol Rocamora’s translations of Chekhov’s complete dramatic works, as well as her biography
Anton Chekhov: A Life in Four Acts, are published by Smith & Kraus.

Reprinted from January 2016 BAMbill.

Prokofiev Lyrical, Prokofiev Grotesque

$
0
0
Hear all five of Prokofiev’s piano concertos—performed by the pianists Daniil Trifonov, George Li, Alexander Toradze Sergei Redkin, and Sergei Babayan under conductor Valery Gergiev—Wednesday, February 24 at 7:30pm in the Howard Gilman Opera House in Folk, Form, and Fire: The Prokofiev Piano Concertos, part of the The Mariinsky at BAM.

Photo: Daniil Trifonov
By Robert Wood

Written between 1911 and 1932, Prokofiev’s piano concertos trade in tempered lyricism, sardonic mischief-making, and jackhammer virtuosity—often in the span of mere measures. Composed largely to showcase his own keyboard prowess, they also bookend a period of relative experimentation for the composer. In 1932, the Central Committee of the Communist Party issued a decree ushering in what would become the doctrine of Socialist Realism—uplifting art that glorified the state was to supplant all self-indulgent modernist trifling—and Prokofiev, albeit cynically, would become one of its main musical emissaries. Though the provocateur in him found ways to persist during that time (see his Piano Sonata No.7, for example), few of his later works match the piano concertos in their brash commitment to innovation without fear of reproach.

Concerto No. 1 (1911)
The opening fooled everyone: a minute and ten seconds of unabashed romantic indulgence, accomplished by an obsessive three-note motive in the piano and strings that might have made Rachmaninoff himself blush (0:17). But then, mania: a staccato barrage of sixteenth notes, punctuated by all-or-nothing leaps up the keyboard, signaling that Prokofiev’s place on the concerto stage was not to be a regressive one. Premiered by the then-student composer himself in 1912 amid considerable fanfare surrounding his gifts as a pianist, Prokofiev’s first concerto helped to confirm his reputation as a bona fide virtuoso. Apparently, he was also happy with the results; instead of playing a Beethoven or Brahms concerto that year in a student competition (as would have been the norm), Prokofiev opted to play his own.



Concerto No. 2 (1913)

Like a “dragon devouring its young.” That’s how pianist Sviatoslav Richter described the sinister “Intermezzo” movement (17:20) of Prokofiev’s next entry into the piano concerto repertoire, begun only a few months after the premiere of his first. If creatural infanticide wasn’t exactly the composer’s guiding idea here, a desire to depart from what he called the “surface brilliance” of the first concerto certainly was. Proof is in the introductory andantino: an icy piano figure, made up almost entirely of fourths and fifths, suspended precariously above a caustic soup of dissonant strings (00:40). In truth, what we know as the second concerto is actually a reconstruction Prokofiev made from sketches in 1924; the original was supposedly burned for warmth by his former flat mates during the Russian revolution.



Concerto No. 3 (1921)
In early 1918, on the eve of Civil War, Prokofiev took the last train out of Petrograd before the line was shut down for good by anti-Bolshevik forces. He was headed to America—not because of politics, but to become a star. Though Stravinsky’s buzz-worthy Rite of Spring wouldn’t premiere in the US until 1922, gossip surrounding the composer’s incendiary modernism had preceded him, eliding with a general wartime fascination with all things Russian and making the time supposedly ripe for a fellow modernist’s auspicious debut. So there was Prokofiev, emissary of “Godless Russia” and “Russian chaos in music,” as the headlines ballyhooed, debuting his third concerto with the Chicago Symphony. Several of the themes were culled from earlier projects, including the opening clarinet line, taken from an abandoned string quartet that was to use only the white notes of the piano keyboard. Reviews in Chicago were mixed, proving that Rachmaninoff was still America's Russian du jour. But audiences would soon come around; today, Prokofiev’s third concerto is a warhorse of the repertoire.



Concerto No. 4 (1931) 
The left-handed pianist Paul Wittgenstein, who lost his right arm in WWI, was tough to please. Seeking to continue the concert career he’d begun shortly before the war, he set out to commission a series of left-hand-only works from the world’s most famous composers, but few of the results took. In Ravel’s radiant concerto for the left hand, the gold standard of the genre, the accompaniment was deemed too sparse. In Richard Strauss’s Panathenäenzug for piano and orchestra, it was too overbearing. “How can one hand compete with a quadruple orchestra?,” he complained. That an enfant terrible like Prokofiev would fare no better is no surprise. “Thank you very much,” Wittgenstein offered, “but I don’t understand a single note of it and shall not play it.” It was Wittgenstein’s loss, as indelible moments abound: an unhinged melody in the slow movement that switchbacks its way down to the depths (05:50), a sinister moderato movement in which piano channels bassoon (13:06), and enigma of an ending that evaporates into thin air (21:40).



Concerto No. 5 (1932)
In a letter to a friend on April 9, 1932, Prokofiev wrote: “The ‘Music for Piano and Orchestra’ is coming along, but unfortunately it’s turning out to be rather difficult for the pianist; I had been hoping to come up with a piece that was easy but effective.” In the end, what he came up with was the fifth and final concerto—effective but hardly easy—proving that, in matters of technique at least, the virtuoso in Prokofiev would always have the upper hand. The composer premiered it himself in Berlin, performing under Furtwängler. What remained of that initial desire for easiness was the brevity of the movements: five minutes on average, with one lasting only two. And yet all of Prokofiev was there: a vagabond, emphatically tonal lyricism; wraith-like swoops up and down the keyboard (5:24), and seductive sadisms of every sort.



Folk, Form & Fire: The Prokofiev Piano Concertos comes to BAM on Wed, Feb 24, and great seats are still available.

Robert Wood is a Senior Copywriter at BAM.

Akram Khan's Stolen Memories

$
0
0
The following is an essay from 2011 that was included inBAM: The Complete Works, an overview of BAM's history. Akram Khan is a dancer and choreographer who returns to BAM March 2—5 with Torobaka, a collaboration with flamenco dancer Israel Galván.

BAM Majestic/Harvey Theater, 2003. Photo: Ned Witrogen
By Akram Khan

Winter, 27 years ago, I entered through the front door of the Majestic Theater—renamed the Harvey in 1999 in honor of Harvey Lichtenstein—then a young actor in Peter Brook’s production of  The Mahabharata. I was 14 years old and immediately quite disorientated by the unfinished demeanor of the building. Of course, my naiveté lead me to believe that maybe the builders, decorators, and electricians had not finished refurbishing the interior and exterior for our big opening night. But then I asked one of the actors, who impatiently told me: “This is it.” From then on, I decided to make the place my friend. If I was going to spend three months here, then I would make it my home. So all throughout the rehearsal period, I started to explore every corner, passageway, closet, and even the overhead walkways, which had access to the lighting rig high above the stage. I probably knew the layout better than the caretakers. And for the next few months, this place became my imagined, magical world.

Akram Khan (featured) in The Mahabharata,
Peter Brook and Jean-Claude Carrière, 1987. Photo: Gilles Abegg
However, I would like to confess now that during my stay at BAM, at the end of one particular show, when the audience had left and the stage crew was preparing to leave, and the actors were still in the dressing rooms taking off their costumes and makeup, I took it upon myself to chip away a bit of the infamous stone wall that created the backdrop of the show using one of the props from the production, and kept it for personal memory. It was a terrible thing to do, I know, but at the time, I wanted to hold on to some essence of my magical time at the Harvey. I knew I might never come back there, in the same way, ever again.

Juliette Binoche and Akram Khan
in In-I (Next Wave Festival 2009)
Autumn, 22 years later, I entered through the front door of the Harvey, this time as a choreographer/dancer of the Akram Khan Company. I was now 34 years of age, and immediately quite disorientated by the still unfinished demeanor of the building. What struck me was that the theater I remembered as a child had been somehow preserved or frozen in time. Some people say that theater work has the ability to transport you to the past or to the future, well, it was no work of theater, but the theater itself, that instantly transformed me back into the child I was two decades before. And as I was now given a tour around the theater, my right hand was in my jacket pocket, stroking the very piece of evidence that I stole as a memory. And I was smiling—not sure why, but I knew I had to return the small part of the theater I had sliced off 22 years before. I had to empty the burden I had carried with me for so many years. It is now a great relief to say that I returned the chipped stone to its origin and left it somewhere in the corner of the stage, close to the infamous wall I had illegally tortured.

Writing this now, I realize that the reason I decided to return the chipped stone was because as a child I thought the memory was hidden within the object, but now I realize that the memory was actually stored somewhere in my body. I didn’t need another object to hold it for me. I didn’t realize or trust that knowledge as a child. But this understanding that my body is the closest object I could possess, which would store all my secret adventures, scars, hopes, and desires, was one of the most important lessons in my career. How blessed we are to be given a body that witnesses and absorbs all our secrets from the moment we are born.

Akram Khan returns to BAM March 2—5 with Torobaka, a collaboration with flamenco dancer Israel Galván.

BAM Illustrated: Eileen Myles for President!

$
0
0
Celebrated poet and essayist Eileen Myles comes to BAM on March 1 as part of our Eat, Drink & Be Literary series. Illustrator Nathan Gelgud revisits Myles' participation in the 1992 presidential election, when she ran as an "openly female" write-in candidate.




Note: Most of the dialogue attributed to Myles comes from her original campaign letters, but some of it is made up.

Sources:

See more work by Nathan Gelgud on his website.
 
Eileen Myles comes to BAM on March 1 as part of Eat, Drink & Be Literary.

Be my adventurous artist, audience, and idea!

$
0
0
We’d like to think that we’re no softies here at the BAM blog and that we’re immune to Valentine’s Day sentiment. But for the second year in a row, we're really feeling the love. To express our amour, we looked to some of our favorite moments from the last year (and a few of our upcoming programs!) for new ways to play cupid.

Send the images below to your paramours via Twitter or Facebook. Or click for larger versions to print or save to your desktop. Happy Valentine's Day!

Hocus Pocus (Part of BAMcinématek series Witches' Brew)


A Tribute to Maya Plisetskaya (Part of 2016 Winter/Spring Season and the Mariinsky at BAM)


Nufonia Must Fall (Part of 2015 Next Wave Festival)


Swan Lake (Part of 2015 Winter/Spring Season and the Mariinsky at BAM)


Opus (Part of 2015 Next Wave Festival)


The Hard Nut(Part of 2015 Next Wave Festival)


The Queen (Part of BAMcinématek series From the Third Eye: Evergreen Review on Film)


YOU US WE ALL (Part of 2015 Next Wave Festival)


Graphic Details: Designing Migrating Forms

$
0
0


At BAM, it isn't uncommon for the seed of a design idea to originate with a print designer and only later make its way to the video team for adaption there. This makes sense when a campaign calls for more postcards and brochures, say, then video trailers. But for Migrating Forms, a boundary-pushing film and video festival now in its third year at BAM, we turned that model on its head. Apropos of the festival’s name and cinematic bent, ideas were passed back and forth between print and video, each informing the other, to create an identity that honors its shape-shifting subject in a multitude of ways.



The Background 

The goal of Migrating Forms is to bridge the gap between the art and film worlds by bringing together moving image work from a wide range of venues—video art from biennials and museums, experimental film from festivals and microcinemas, and so much in between. Aesthetically, it leans towards the experimental, blending heady art-world conceptualism and filmic innovations of every sort into an eclectic cinematic experience.   

To create the visual identity for this year's incarnation, we began by distilling these ideas into a few keywords: film, hybridization, elusiveness, sophistication, and, most importantly, motion the illusion of motion—the essence of cinema. The identity would need to at least hint at these ideas, but without being too alienating or intimidating. It would also need to do this within the bounds of the larger BAM identity, which has its own rules to be followed, or lovingly bent.

Lastly, and for practical reasons, it would need to accomplish this through a typographic treatment that was graphically strong enough to stand on its own while still being flexible enough to work over images. Websites, emails, banners, brochures, Instagram posts, Facebook ads, and other mediums all have their own best practices, and a visual identity should be flexible enough to accommodate them all.

Creating a Visual Language 

Step one was the creation of an inspiration board showcasing a few different ways type can be used to suggest motion and illusive depth:


From there, we turned to our own typeface, News Gothic, and began sketching ways that it could be similarly manipulated:


Out of this came our first design iteration, based on the notion of a warped grid. A regular square grid was established and then arbitrarily manipulated. The letters were then adjusted to fit the resulting lines:


But the results seemed too arbitrary and lacking in conceptual clarity. The desired effect of motion and illusion had been subsumed by a more general effect of morphing. 

With inspiration from BAM Creative Director Andrew Sloat, we shifted the focus to an idea more directly based in animation: the notion that 2D letterforms moving through space create the illusion of 3D. We then combined that concept with another iteration of the warped grid from the example above. Here, however, the grid is three-dimensional, made up of non-parallel planes that dictate the distorted, or "migrating," forms of the letters as they project into space:  


Here is a print study of the idea based on the animation:



And here is another iteration applied to the full title. As you can see, the distorting effect of the non-parallel planes on the letterforms is even more exaggerated here:


  




But ultimately, this too felt a bit arbitrary and lacking in a certain conceptual elegance. Something of BAM's overall identity, so rooted in a clean and confident sans-seriff simplicity, was also being lost.

Towards the Final Identity

The solution was to simplify. Designer Kyle Richardson returned to a 3D "wireframe" of an "M" in News Gothic and took a different point of departure: the triangles, parallelograms, and other latent geometries that the eye sees haphazardly in a 3D image (see the middle image below), causing it to shuttle back and forth between flatness and depth. The extruded 'M' appears to be a representation of a three-dimensional letterform, but a closer look reveals that each plane is actually a separate and disconnected shape. To further emphasize the effect, Kyle subjected those geometries to a process of subtraction that fragmented and further abstracted the letterform while preserving its overall shape. The result is the image on the right:


Here is the idea adapted into an animation by video editor Kaitlyn Chandler:



For the final iteration, the idea was tightened even further. The fragmented geometries were simplified, increasing legibility while emphasizing a more rational, rhythmic relationship between the resulting angles and shapes.



The simplified concept was then passed back to video, where Kaitlin developed an animation called "fireflies" to trace the fragmented geometries and further obscure the visual cues that help differentiate two- from three-dimensions: 




Finally, designer Alison Whitworth created a static version that picks up on Kaitlyn's "fireflies" concept, resulting in the festival poster below:
27' x 40' poster, adapted by designer Alison Whitworth 

The result is an identity, born out of its own process of migrating forms, that we feel serves the festival well. It pays homage to the filmic illusion of motion and depth. It maintains legibility while flirting with obfuscation and formal abstraction. And it echos the festival's hard-to-pin-down programming with an identity always in flux.


Instagram video, adapted by Kaitlyn Chandler

Migrating Forms creative team: Andrew Sloat (Creative Director), Kyle Richardson (Designer), Kaitlyn Chandler (Video Editor), and Alison Whitworth (Designer).

Related Post:
Graphic Details: A Visual Identity for BAMcinemaFest 2014

In Context: The Cherry Orchard

$
0
0


The Maly Drama Theatre comes to BAM February 17–27 with Anton Chekhov’s masterpiece The Cherry Orchard. Context is everything, so get even closer to the production with this curated selection of articles and videos related to the show. After you've attended the show, let us know what you thought below and by posting on social media using #TheCherryOrchard.

Program Notes

Coming soon!

Read

Article
“A Life in Theater: Lev Dodin” (The Guardian)
For Dodin, “theatre became a little corner of freedom” amid an anxious wartime existence.

Article
The Maly's Cherry (BAM blog)
It was a farewell to the old order, written while its author battled tuberculosis. But Chekhov’s The Cherry Orchard, he insisted, was every bit a comedy.

Website
Maly Drama Theatre
Founded in Leningrad in 1944, the Russian theater is now revered the world over.

Article
Anton Chekhov and Modernity (Yale.edu)
Chekhov must be understood amid the “rise of the bourgeoisie, the decline of the aristocracy, and the imminence of revolution.”

Excerpt
“Why We Love Chekhov”(NPR)
"Never difficult but often demanding ... sometimes dour, but rarely hopeless."

Watch & Listen

Video
On Lev Dodin and the Maly Drama Theatre (YouTube)
Dodin reflects on the musicality of theater and more in this panoramic documentary.

Now your turn...

What did you think? What was special about Maly Drama Theatre’s approach to the play? Tell us what's on your mind in the comments below and on social media using #TheCherryOrchard.

BAM Blog Questionnaire: The Cherry Orchard's Danila Kozlovksy

$
0
0
The Maly Drama Theatre of St. Petersburg is famous for its imaginative productions and Artistic Director Lev Dodin is renowned for his commitment to training and ensemble work. We spoke with Danila Kozlovsky, who plays Lopakhin in The Cherry Orchard (coming to the BAM Harvey Feb 17—27), about the company’s rehearsal process and how theater is a lot like professional sports. 

Danila Kozlovski and Elizaveta BoIarskaya in The Cherry Orchard. Photo: Viktor Vasiliev

1. How does Maly Drama Theatre training differ from other theater schools or companies?

I studied for five years in Lev Dodin’s acting course at the St. Petersburg Theatre Academy, and had the immense luck to perform as Edgar in Dodin’s production of King Lear during my third year. I joined the Maly Drama Company when I graduated in 2008. Most theater companies in Russia, like ours, have a full-time roster of actors and a permanent repertoire. But in a majority of theater companies, training and professional acting are clearly divided. A few years after joining a company, some actors consider themselves professionals—they think they know everything they need to know. It could be viewed as complacency or as self-assuredness, depending on your point of view.

I’m biased but I think Dodin’s way of training is the best: the training process continues seamlessly from the Theatre Academy into the Maly Drama Theatre. For five years we had daily training in classical dance, acrobatics, singing, instrumental music, voice, and speech. Before every show we do extensive warm-ups targeted at what the actors need for that particular performance—voice and speech (always), singing (always), classical dance, acrobatics, orchestra—whatever is needed. Spending an hour or two warming up together before the show allows us not only to hone the practical disciplines, but also to reestablish our connection as a company, which is essential for acting together onstage.

2. What are your favorite aspects of the training? Most challenging?

In many respects, theater can be compared to professional sports—at least in terms of training and form. It’s hard to imagine an American football or baseball player stepping out into the arena of a packed stadium not having trained for a month. He’d never play well. We are so used to our warm-ups before every performance that we can’t imagine going onstage without them. And actually the audience feels it immediately. They might not know what exactly is off, but every member of the audience is aware that he or she is somehow being cheated out of the full experience. Training and warm-ups discipline you, it helps you stay on form. 

Photo: Viktor Vasiliev


3. What was your rehearsal process like for The Cherry Orchard?

What I love about rehearsing with [Lev] Dodin is that we never just turn up and meekly expect him to tell us where to enter, where to stand, and what face to make when saying this or that line. We go onstage and we propose things to the director according to our sgovor (Stanislavsky’s term meaning “complicity/collusion/betrothal,” signifying the system of ethical, esthetic, and human values the director and his company of actors generally share, and in regard to the specific literary material they are rehearsing).

We do the scene the way we think it could have happened, and Dodin uses it as a starting point for the rehearsal. This method makes an actor feel he is a valid co-author and not just a medium. It gives an actor a whole new level of freedom in rehearsal. By the end of rehearsing a scene—or the play—Dodin will have explained to us where to enter, where to stand, and how to convey a line, but we’ll have made that journey together.

4. What are the benefits of working and training with the same ensemble for many years?

Right before the New Year, several actors in our company got sick and several others could not go onstage for other reasons. A performance of one of our most popular titles was scheduled, and had sold out well ahead of time. A decision was made not to cancel, not to substitute another production, but to go ahead and perform. With four stand-ins taking on very complex lead parts, the production was practically a new show, staged with few rehearsals. I was in the audience that night and I can say honestly and objectively that it was one of our best and most serious performances of the year. I saw this magic thing—sgovor—work, and work to perfection. Stanislavsky wrote pages and pages on end about this concept, but it’s very elusive. It’s when the actors and the director share common goals and a language only they understand. It occurs when the actors understand and feel together, when they perform as a team. (I think that’s how soccer club Barcelona plays its best matches.) It does not always happen. But that night I sat in our auditorium and saw it happen on our stage, in our theater.


In Context: Folk, Form, and Fire: The Prokofiev Piano Concertos

$
0
0










Conductor Valery Gergiev, the Mariinsky Orchestra, and five renowned soloists perform Sergei Prokofiev's piano concertos in this marriage of virtuosic repertoire and pianistic might—part of year two of the Mariinsky’s residency at BAM. Context is everything, so get even closer to the program with this curated selection of articles and videos related to the show. After you've attended the show, let us know what you thought below and by posting on social media using #MariinskyBAM.

Program Notes

Coming soon!

Read

Article
“Prokofiev Lyrical, Prokofiev Grotesque” (BAM blog)
One was supposed to be easy (It wasn’t). One was supposed to boost the career of a one-armed pianist (It didn’t). But Prokofiev’s piano concertos mesmerize nonetheless.

Article
“Prokofiev: The Genius in Stalin’s Shadow”(Radio Free Europe)
Prokofiev’s return to the Soviet Union was the ultimate Faustian bargain.

Article
“Daniil Trifonov: A Pianist Ahead of his Time”(Washington Post)
A profile of the rising Russian star.

Watch & Listen

Website
Drawing on the theatre's rich legacy, the Mariinsky Label showcases the company's extraordinary talent with new recordings of both iconic and lesser-known works.

Audio & Video
Sergei Prokofiev (BBC)
Explore all things Prokofiev at this BBC site devoted to the composer.

Video
Living the Classical Life: Daniil Trifonov (YouTube)
Practicing underwater helps, a simple phrase can be played a thousand ways, and other lessons from the introspective star.

Video
George Li in Recital (RuTube.ru)
Li offers Beethoven, Liszt, and Chopin in this solo performance.

Video
Sergei Redkin at the XV Tchaikovsky Competition (Medici.tv)
Watch Redkin’s performance in Round 1 of the prestigious competition.

Video
Sergei Babayan & Daniil Trifonov Play Rachmaninoff (Medici.tv)
The pianists perform the composer’s Suite No.2 for two pianos.

Video
Alexander Toradze Plays Prokofiev (YouTube)
Toradze plays the raucous final movement of Prokofiev’s seventh piano sonata.

Now your turn...


What did you think? Who captured the folk, who the form, and who the fire? Tell us what's on your mind in the comments below and on social media using #MariinskyBAM.

In Context: A Tribute to Maya Plisetskaya

$
0
0

For decades, the legendary Maya Plisetskaya—muse to choreographers Yuri Grigorovich, Alberto Alonso, and Maurice Béjart—was synonymous with Russian ballet. Now, prima ballerinas Diana Vishneva and Uliana Lopatkina pay tribute to Plisetskaya in four distinctive ballet programs Feb 25—28, part of year two of the Mariinsky’s residency at BAM. Context is everything, so get even closer to the program with this curated selection of articles and videos related to the show. After you've attended the show, let us know what you thought below and by posting on social media using #MariinskyBAM.

Program Notes

Coming soon!

Read

Article
“Honoring Maya Plisetskaya” (BAM Blog)
She was a symbol of Soviet Russia. Yet with “wild pantherine leaps” and fans that included Jackie Kennedy, her dancing transcended politics.

Article
“Maya Plisetskaya: A Life in Art” (RBTH.com)
The remarkable Plisetskaya was a “star that drew the most remarkable people of her time into her orbit.”

Article
“Diana Vishneva: It’s Not My Wish to Run The Bolshoi”(The Guardian)
Though thoroughly associated with Russia, Vishneva is one of the most cosmopolitan ballerinas of her generation.

Watch & Listen

Website
The Mariinsky Theatre
Take a virtual tour of the famous concert hall, read about the theater's history, and more.

Website
The Mariinsky Label
Drawing on the theatre's rich legacy, the Mariinsky Label showcases the company's extraordinary talent with new recordings of both iconic and lesser-known works.

Video
An Uliana Lopatkina Documentary (50YearsInDance.com)
Spectacular footage of a ballerina at work.

Video
“Diana Vishneva: Pivotal Pointe” (YouTube)
“Dancing has become a necessity,” says Vishneva. “It’s my nature, it’s who I am. I simply don’t exist without dancing.”

Video
Uliana Lopatkina performs The Dying Swan (YouTube)
Unrivaled grace, from wing to toe.

Now your turn...


What did you think? Does Plisetskaya’s flame have new keepers in Vishneva and Lopatkina? Tell us what's on your mind in the comments below and on social media using #MariinskyBAM.

In Context: Rimbaud in New York

$
0
0



In this prismatic collage of song and story, theater company The Civilians (Paris Commune, 2012 Next Wave Festival) use music-theater to consider the life and lasting influence of modernism’s most elusive enfant terrible: Arthur Rimbaud. Context is everything, so get even closer to Rimbaud in New York with this curated selection of content related to the show. After you've attended the show, let us know what you thought below and by posting on social media using #RimbaudNY.

Program Notes

Coming soon!

Read

Website
The Civilians
Learn more about The Civilians’ investigative theater.

Article
“Visionary Materialism”(The New Republic)
How should Rimbaud’s Illuminations make readers feel? “Very nervous,” according to Adam Thirwell.

Article
Arthur Rimbaud and Patti Smith(The Independent)
At 16, Patti Smith took Rimbaud as her imaginary boyfriend.

Article
On Rimbaud (PoetryFoundation.org)
He ran away from home three times. He was shot in the wrist by Verlaine. And he died of cancer of the knee.

Review
John Ashbery’s Translation of Illuminations (The New York Times)
Lydia Davis on poet John Ashbery’s “meticulously faithful yet nimbly inventive” translation, used throughout Rimbaud in New York.

Watch & Listen

Audio
Patti Smith - Horses (YouTube)
The downtown icon's rock anthem implores listeners to "go Rimbaud!"

Now your turn...

What did you think? Did The Civilians illuminate Illuminations? Tell us what's on your mind in the comments below and on social media using #RimbaudNY.

Desperately Seeking Rimbaud

$
0
0
The Civilians’ production of Rimbaud in New York, written and directed by Steve Cosson, with poems by Arthur Rimbaud translated by John Ashbery and produced by BAM with major support from the Poetry Foundation, runs at the BAM Fisher from March 1—6.

By Steve Cosson

Last season I had the good fortune to direct Joely Richardson in the one-woman show about Emily Dickinson by William Luce, The Belle of Amherst. That show, originally created for Julie Harris in the 70s, invented a kind of theatrical language for making theater about a writer and a writer’s work. I learned much from this form, and learned even more in the rehearsal room with Joely as I followed her emotional and mental intelligence into a deep excavation of the poems.

While working on The Belle of Amherst, I wondered about how I would go about creating a show based on poetry were I to start with the text and have free rein to go from there. Specifically, I was curious as to what might be gained by not centering the show on the character of the writer herself or himself. What might be revealed if one worked from the poems and how they are read, rather then how they might have been written? Is there a way to stage the multiple meanings of a poet’s work and the numerous and contradictory resonances a poet has for different readers and in different eras?

These questions lingered in the back of my mind when BAM approached me with the invitation to make a new show through this first-time collaboration of BAM and the Poetry Foundation. I was thrilled by the idea, naturally said yes, and we embarked on a process to choose a work of poetry. After considering many possible paths, I ultimately chose Rimbaud’s Illuminations in its recent translation by the great American poet John Ashbery. There were many reasons for choosing Rimbaud, but at the top of the pile is the fact that reading these poems did something to me. It felt like an action; it felt physical—a sense of being taken through a visceral experience of image and sensation.

Even more than that, Illuminations stretched my mind to see the unseeable, to try to think the unimaginable. Like stepping just partly into another dimension, these poems gave glimpses into another universe with very different laws of physics. Such an experience cracks open the ordinary world we live in. His poems are in a sense a gateway drug, but in the best possible way—a gateway to possibility, an escape hatch out of all that is boring or oppressive, and a bridge to life lived fully awake.

In choosing Rimbaud I also have a ripe opportunity to try out my ideas for how to make a different type of show about a writer. It is of course very tempting to consider putting Rimbaud himself on stage. His life was nothing if not dramatic. But I think, perhaps more than any other poet, Rimbaud suggests a show that is the exact opposite of character-centric. Rimbaud’s poems create and populate worlds. His poems have had a profound legacy with later readers and cultural movements that he could never have imagined. The poems are there with the Surrealists, the New York School, the birth of punk, the downtown scenes of poetry and visual art, and of course among writers and readers today.

Rimbaud may have only had a tiny audience for his work when he was alive, but since that time his influence has been vast, particularly considering the musician/poets he’s influenced such as Patti Smith and Bob Dylan, and others who have brought their own Rimbaudian visions to new publics. And although Rimbaud himself never came to America, he has been and still is very much present, particularly in “downtown” New York City (wherever that may be now that affordable artist communities have been pushed out and dispersed).

In creating the Civilians’ show Rimbaud in New York, this presence of Rimbaud in downtown was my way in. I interviewed many poets, artists, and performers: Eileen Myles, Dael Orlandersmith, Adam Fitzgerald, CA Conrad, Ariana Reines, David Wojnarowicz’s biographer Cindy Carr, and John Ashbery, to name a few.

I immersed myself in the work of the founding mothers and fathers of downtown performance and film—Jack Smith, most significantly. And then I gathered a group of performers, songwriters, and designers to make our show, a show which we’ve set in the multiple layers of New York’s downtown cultural scenes. But the center of the event is the living, very present voice of these extraordinary poems.

Reprinted from February 2016 BAMbill.

Shakespeare's Henriad

$
0
0
Nigel Lindsay, David Tennant in Richard II. Photo: Kwame Lestrade
By Christian Barclay

When Shakespeare began to write his second tetralogy of history plays in the late 1590s, Elizabeth I had ruled England for more than 30 years. Her golden age reign transformed the country and established it as the dominant economic and naval power of Europe. Britannia became the symbol of national pride—a personification of the ideals of an ever-expanding empire.

This fervor of nationalism was accompanied by the rise of the chronicle play, also known as a history play. These plays focused on events of the country’s past, often presenting them as allegories of power, rebellion, and atonement. Their authors capitalized on the national consciousness by producing works that imagined the inner lives of England’s storied monarchs.

Shakespeare’s 10 medieval history plays span a period from the late 14th century to the ascension of Henry VIII in 1485. In chronological order, these are King John; Richard II; Henry IV Parts 1 and 2; Henry V; Henry VI Parts 1, 2, and 3; Richard III; and Henry VIII. The epic cycle dramatizes five generations of dynastic power struggles, focusing largely on the tumultuous events of the Hundred Years War and the War of the Roses.

This year marks the 400th anniversary of Shakespeare’s death and the Royal Shakespeare Company is honoring the event with a landmark cycle of the Henriad plays—Richard II, Henry IV Parts 1 and 2, and Henry Vwhich will be presented at the BAM Harvey from March 24—May 1. “It’s something that Stratford and the RSC have made a specialty of doing,” Gregory Doran, RSC’s Artistic Director, told Plays International, “putting plays together and encouraging a conversation between them.”

The Henriad plays are a contemplation of power and leadership—how they are acquired, maintained, and lost. The sweeping saga takes the audience through the destabilizing effects of Richard II’s overthrow and abdication to the unsteady rise of Henry V. A host of historical and fictional characters—both high- and low-born—revolve around the monarchs in shifting alliances.

The cycle begins with Richard II, a vain and insecure ruler whose steadfast belief in the royal prerogative led to his downfall. Having been crowned at the age of 10, Richard II didn’t have the opportunity to earn the throne, he merely inherited it. His arbitrary aggressions toward the nobility—in particular, Henry Bolinbgroke, who would later become Henry IV—weaken his authority and cast him as an impetuous and irresponsible leader.

Richard II questions the absoluteness of the royal prerogative. Does a king derive his power from God’s grace or his own innate worth? When confronted with news of Bolingbroke’s burgeoning rebellion, Richard is defiant: “Not all the water in the rough rude sea / Can wash the balm from an anointed king” (Act 3, Scene 2). Richard’s unyielding position blinds him from the realization that there is no power without the people.

Jennifer Kirby, Trevor White in Henry IV Part I. Photo: Kwame Lestrade
Henry IV Part I tackles the ramifications of Richard’s death and the troubled conscience of the new king. How can a leader inspire honor through dishonorable actions? Henry hopes to lead a crusade to the Holy Land to atone for his sins, but must attend to more pressing domestic matters: a growing opposition from the very nobles who helped him to the throne and his rebellious son and heir, Prince Hal.

The concept of honor is a central theme. For Henry, it is essential—a ruler is nothing without the honor and reverence of his people. What he lost during his fight for the crown must be regained if he hopes to hold his position. Sir John Falstaff, Prince Hal’s dissolute partner-in-revelry, holds a more cynical view.

Falstaff’s diatribe against honor, delivered before the climatic battle at Shrewsbury, questions the entire set of moral values that define the monarchy: “What is honour? A word. What is in that word honour? / What is that honour? Air. A trim reckoning! Who hath it? / He that died o’ Wednesday. Doth he feel it? No. / Doth he hear it? No. ’Tis insensible then? Yea, / to the dead” (Act 5, Scene I).

As Henry’s rule begins to wane, he contemplates past events and wrestles with his desire to shape the future. Henry IV Part 2 is the portrait of a king in his twilight years, contemplating the burden of power, old age, and atonement. As his health declines and the threat of civil war looms over the country, Henry confronts mortality and ponders his legacy.

It isn’t until the final act that Henry reconciles with his son and grants Hal the honor that eluded him—the peaceful bestowal of power. “God knows, my son / By what by-paths and indirect crook’d ways / I met this crown; and I myself know well / How troublesome it sat upon my head. / To thee it shall descend with bitter quiet / Better opinion, better confirmation; For all the soil of the achievement goes / With me into the earth” (Act 5, Scene 5). In being a rightful king, Henry hopes that his son will be a better leader.

The final play of the Henriad is Henry V, a stirring tale of the warrior king. Henry’s defiant claim to France is tested on the battlefield, as is his ability to inspire his countrymen. As Prince Hal, Henry struggled with the idea of leadership, its expectations and implications. But as the ascendant Henry V, we see a more defined monarch who views power not as a burden, but as a responsibility.

In his rousing Saint Crispin’s Day speech, delivered before the tide-turning Battle of Agincourt, Henry is the embodiment of a heroic English king. His call to arms is a vision of glory that will unite all men, regardless of birth or rank: “And Crispin Crispian shall ne’er go by / From this day to the ending of the world, / But we in it shall be rememberèd;/ We few, we happy few, we band of brothers; / For he to-day that sheds his blood with me / Shall be my brother” (Act 4, Scene 3).

The Henriad is a study of the difficult personal and ethical choices that accompany political life. Though Shakespeare’s history plays rarely receive the same adoration as his comedies and tragedies, they defined a new genre of theater and gave voice to a nation’s worldview. As tales of power gained and power lost, they are rife with lessons that continue to reverberate 400 years later.

Shakespeare's Henriad comes to the Harvey Theater March 24—May 1

Christian Barclay is a publicist at BAM.

Reprinted from February 2016 BAMbill.
Viewing all 1023 articles
Browse latest View live